Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
All submissions must meet the following requirements.
- This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
- This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
- All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
- All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
- Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.
Articles
Secti
The Articles section publishes original, high-quality scholarly research that makes a substantive contribution to knowledge in accounting, business, finance, corporate governance, sustainability (ESG), and related interdisciplinary fields. This section serves as the journal’s core outlet for empirically grounded, theoretically informed, and methodologically rigorous studies with clear academic and practical relevance.
ABGS welcomes quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, including but not limited to econometric analyses, case studies, surveys, experiments, archival research, and analytical modeling. Submissions must demonstrate strong theoretical foundations, clearly articulated research questions or hypotheses, robust research design, and transparent data analysis.
Articles should contribute by advancing theory, testing or refining existing frameworks, introducing novel empirical evidence, or offering policy-relevant insights, particularly in emerging, transitional, and global contexts. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive or lack analytical depth will not be considered.
All articles are subject to double-blind peer review by at least two independent reviewers and are evaluated based on originality, rigor, clarity, coherence, and contribution to the literature. Submissions must comply with APA (7th edition) referencing standards and engage with recent, high-quality international research.
The recommended length for articles is 6,000–9,000 words, inclusive of references and excluding tables and figures. Authors must adhere to ABGS policies on research ethics, data transparency, conflict of interest disclosure, and responsible use of artificial intelligence.
Review Article
The Review Articles section publishes high-quality, critical, and integrative reviews that synthesize and evaluate existing scholarship in accounting, business, corporate governance, sustainability (ESG), and related interdisciplinary fields. This section aims to advance theoretical understanding, identify research gaps, and set future research agendas.
ABGS welcomes systematic literature reviews, bibliometric and scientometric analyses, and theoretical or narrative reviews, provided they demonstrate methodological rigor, transparency, and clear scholarly contribution. Systematic and bibliometric reviews must explicitly describe data sources, inclusion and exclusion criteria, analytical techniques, and replication procedures. Narrative and conceptual reviews should present a well-structured analytical framework and offer critical insights beyond descriptive summaries.
Review articles should make a substantive contribution by consolidating fragmented literature, resolving inconsistencies in prior findings, developing new conceptual models, or proposing directions for future empirical and theoretical research. Submissions that merely summarize existing studies without critical analysis will not be considered.
All review articles undergo double-blind peer review and are evaluated based on originality, methodological rigor, coherence, clarity of synthesis, and relevance to the journal’s scope. Manuscripts must adhere to APA (7th edition) referencing style and demonstrate engagement with recent, high-quality international literature.
The recommended length for review articles is 7,000–10,000 words, inclusive of references and excluding tables and figures. Authors must comply with ABGS ethical standards, data transparency requirements (where applicable), and AI-use disclosure policies.
Policy Papers
The Policy Papers section publishes analytically grounded contributions that examine, evaluate, and inform public policy, regulatory frameworks, governance practices, and institutional reforms in accounting, business, finance, corporate governance, sustainability (ESG), and related domains. This section aims to bridge academic research and real-world decision-making by providing evidence-based insights with clear policy relevance.
Policy papers should be problem-driven and explicitly articulate the policy context, objectives, stakeholders, and implications. Submissions may draw on empirical evidence, comparative analysis, legal and regulatory review, institutional analysis, or structured synthesis of existing research. While full empirical testing is not mandatory, arguments must be analytical, transparent, and grounded in credible evidence.
Contributions are expected to offer clear policy recommendations, implementation considerations, and discussion of trade-offs, feasibility, and potential unintended consequences. Papers that are purely descriptive, advocacy-based, or opinion pieces without analytical support will not be considered.
All policy papers are subject to double-blind peer review and are evaluated on policy relevance, analytical rigor, clarity of argumentation, originality, and contribution to scholarly and practitioner debates. Manuscripts must follow APA (7th edition) referencing standards and comply with ABGS ethical, disclosure, and AI-use policies.
The recommended length for policy papers is 3,500–6,000 words, inclusive of references and excluding tables and figures.
Conceptual Papers
The Conceptual Papers section publishes original scholarly contributions that advance, refine, or integrate theory in accounting, business, corporate governance, sustainability (ESG), and related interdisciplinary fields. This section is dedicated to theory-driven work that develops new conceptual frameworks, extends existing theories, or offers novel theoretical syntheses with clear implications for future research and practice.
Conceptual papers must be analytical and theory-focused, grounded in an in-depth and critical engagement with the relevant literature. While empirical data are not required, submissions should go beyond narrative discussion by offering clear constructs, propositions, relationships, or models that enhance theoretical understanding. Manuscripts that are purely speculative, descriptive, or opinion-based without rigorous conceptual development will not be considered.
Contributions should demonstrate theoretical originality, internal coherence, and relevance to contemporary academic and policy debates. Authors are encouraged to explicitly articulate how their conceptual contributions inform empirical research agendas, methodological choices, or practical and policy-oriented applications.
All conceptual papers are subject to double-blind peer review and are evaluated based on originality, theoretical rigor, clarity of argumentation, coherence of the proposed framework, and contribution to the literature. Submissions must adhere to APA (7th edition) referencing standards and comply with ABGS ethical, disclosure, and responsible AI-use policies.
The recommended length for conceptual papers is 6,000–8,000 words, inclusive of references and excluding tables and figures.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
